[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: removing security/AiSSLtelnet and security/smimemsg

Subject: Re: removing security/AiSSLtelnet and security/smimemsg
From: Greg Troxel <gdt@ir.bbn.com>
To: "OBATA Akio" <obache@netbsd.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:31:24 -0400
Message-ID: <rmiod2pmvz7.fsf@fnord.ir.bbn.com>
In-Reply-To: <op.uhg6aaitcmitfu@ponkan.lins.jp> (OBATA Akio's message of "Sun,14 Sep 2008 23:24:00 +0900")
References: <rmi3ak4an58.fsf@fnord.ir.bbn.com><op.uhg6aaitcmitfu@ponkan.lins.jp>
Cc: pkgsrc-users@netbsd.org, tech-pkg-ja@jp.netbsd.org
Delivered-To: mailing list tech-pkg-ja@jp.netbsd.org
Mailing-List: contact tech-pkg-ja-help@jp.netbsd.org; run by ezmlm-idx
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix)

  Why just for AiSSLtelnet and security/smimemsg?
  security/AiCA is also same situation and all seems in same project.

Only because I didn't notice AiCA.

That looks like a straight BSD license, so I'm not sure why we had
LICENSE= - perhaps due to MD5.

If someone would like to fix the packages, that would be great.  It just
seemed like unfetchable distfiles and 404 homepages meant that no one
cared any more.

PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: removing security/AiSSLtelnet and security/smimemsg
  - From: Takahiro Kambe <taca@back-street.net>

References:
- removing security/AiSSLtelnet and security/smimemsg
  - From: Greg Troxel <gdt@ir.bbn.com>

Prev by Date: MESSAGE NOT DELIVERED: Hey is it you in this video dhdh ?!
Next by Date: Re: removing security/AiSSLtelnet and security/smimemsg
Prev by thread: removing security/AiSSLtelnet and security/smimemsg
Next by thread: Re: removing security/AiSSLtelnet and security/smimemsg
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread